Lossless Compression: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Lossless audio compression is a way to store a WAV file more efficiently without losing any audio information. Popular open formats include Monkey's Audio (APE), FLAC, and WavPack. There are also proprietary formats from Apple and Microsoft. |
Lossless audio compression is a way to store a WAV file more efficiently without losing any audio information. Popular open formats include Monkey's Audio (APE), FLAC, and WavPack. There are also proprietary formats from Apple and Microsoft. |
||
J. River advises using a lossless format rather than WAV. Space is saved and tagging is improved. There is no advantage to using WAV instead of lossless. |
|||
==Audio Quality== |
==Audio Quality== |
||
A lossless audio file will sound exactly the same as its corresponding WAV file. It will deliver bit-for-bit identical data to the audio engine / sound card. |
|||
Decoded PCM audio delivery (from an APE, FLAC, WAV, or any other format) happens early in the J. River audio chain, many seconds before the data is heard and completely detached from playback threads. If the same bits are delivered on the input side (and they are, as this is the whole point of lossless compression) then it doesn't matter the source format. |
Decoded PCM audio delivery (from an APE, FLAC, WAV, or any other format) happens early in the J. River audio chain, in a process many seconds before the data is heard, and in one that is completely detached from playback threads. If the same bits are delivered on the input side (and they are, as this is the whole point of lossless compression) then it doesn't matter the source format. |
||
==Advantages Over WAV== |
==Advantages Over WAV== |
||
Line 25: | Line 27: | ||
Lossless audio compression generally uses about half the disk space of a WAV file. |
Lossless audio compression generally uses about half the disk space of a WAV file. |
||
==Myths About Lossless Compression== |
|||
==Controversy== |
|||
'''Lossless compression is impossible''' |
'''Lossless compression is impossible''' |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
http://www.monkeysaudio.com/theory.html |
http://www.monkeysaudio.com/theory.html |
||
''' |
'''Lossless compression changes timings or causes jitter''' |
||
As mentioned above, the J. River audio engine does file decoding (WAV, APE, FLAC, or any other format) detached from playback. The audio you hear was decoded and delivered |
As mentioned above, the J. River audio engine does file decoding (WAV, APE, FLAC, or any other format) detached from playback. The audio you hear was decoded and delivered several seconds earlier in threads not attached to actual playback. |
||
Decoding a lossless format may cause a slight increase in CPU usage (normally of less than 1%), but it also reduces the file input by about 50%. There's no compelling argument that either of these changes matter, or that one would be better than the other. |
|||
[[Category:Frequently Asked Questions]] |
[[Category:Frequently Asked Questions]] |
Latest revision as of 12:32, 17 September 2010
Overview
Lossless audio compression is a way to store a WAV file more efficiently without losing any audio information. Popular open formats include Monkey's Audio (APE), FLAC, and WavPack. There are also proprietary formats from Apple and Microsoft.
J. River advises using a lossless format rather than WAV. Space is saved and tagging is improved. There is no advantage to using WAV instead of lossless.
Audio Quality
A lossless audio file will sound exactly the same as its corresponding WAV file. It will deliver bit-for-bit identical data to the audio engine / sound card.
Decoded PCM audio delivery (from an APE, FLAC, WAV, or any other format) happens early in the J. River audio chain, in a process many seconds before the data is heard, and in one that is completely detached from playback threads. If the same bits are delivered on the input side (and they are, as this is the whole point of lossless compression) then it doesn't matter the source format.
Advantages Over WAV
Error detection
APE and FLAC use strong error detection to ensure that the data delivered at output time exactly matches the original data presented at encode time.
This way, if data corruption happens (more common than you might expect), you will know. With WAV, corruption will not be detected.
Tagging
Lossless formats have standard tag formats, making preserving and sharing metadata like the artist, album, cover art, etc. straight-forward.
Space savings
Lossless audio compression generally uses about half the disk space of a WAV file.
Myths About Lossless Compression
Lossless compression is impossible
It may seem that you could not save space without losing something. However, consider a ZIP file with a spreadsheet in it. The spreadsheet shrinks when placed in the ZIP, but can be perfectly restored.
You can think of lossless compression as just a more efficient way to store the same sound. There's a technical explanation here: http://www.monkeysaudio.com/theory.html
Lossless compression changes timings or causes jitter
As mentioned above, the J. River audio engine does file decoding (WAV, APE, FLAC, or any other format) detached from playback. The audio you hear was decoded and delivered several seconds earlier in threads not attached to actual playback.
Decoding a lossless format may cause a slight increase in CPU usage (normally of less than 1%), but it also reduces the file input by about 50%. There's no compelling argument that either of these changes matter, or that one would be better than the other.