Talk:Expression Language: Difference between revisions

From wiki.jriver.com
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Tweak to Categories ==

I'm not sure who is autogenerating this (I'm guessing MrC). But I tweaked the categories on the page.
[[User:Glynor|glynor]] ([[User talk:Glynor|talk]]) 10:34, 7 April 2014 (CDT)

==presentation format==
==presentation format==
I think it might be time to break this page up into sub-sections, what do you think?
I think it might be time to break this page up into sub-sections, what do you think?

Latest revision as of 15:34, 7 April 2014

Tweak to Categories

I'm not sure who is autogenerating this (I'm guessing MrC). But I tweaked the categories on the page. glynor (talk) 10:34, 7 April 2014 (CDT)

presentation format

I think it might be time to break this page up into sub-sections, what do you think?

I've come here this morning to add another three expression functions, and already, the 'contents' pane fills the whole screen on initial page load.

I'll add the three anyway and give some thought to what might make the information a little more pallatable

marko

I don't know - if you can come up with something, give it a try. It's easy to revert back to what was there before if you don't like it.

Gateley 09:33, 18 December 2007 (CST)


It should definitely be broken up. If nothing else, expressions containing similar characteristics should be put into one sub section on the page. I.e. every expression relating to filename should be under one subsection. At the moment it counts more then 20 (i.e. 2.2-something). Kind of confusing. Unfortunately, I do not understand expressions well enough to take this job. --Pank 16:48, 31 January 2008 (CST)

I've been kicking a few ideas around lately, and my plan is to get started on this some time next week...

marko 02:03, 1 February 2008 (CST)

Amazing job, Marko. I just had my first opportunity to use this page since you applied all the changes, and it was a pleasure to use. Thank you so much for this! -- glynor 13:08, 12 October 2010 (CDT)